Prosecutors assert that Duane Davis, accused of Tupac’s murder, has no immunity from prosecution in Nevada
Davis, who’s 61, recently asked a judge to throw out the murder charge linked to Tupac’s 1996 drive-by shooting. His lawyer claims that the prosecutors took too long to file charges and broke an agreement that supposedly gave Davis immunity.
But prosecutors fired back, saying Davis hasn’t shown any proof of that immunity. They pointed out that in Nevada, only a court order can protect someone from prosecution.
They also mentioned that a retired detective reopened the case after Davis made some comments in interviews and a book about his supposed role in Tupac’s death. According to them, Davis, who is linked to the South Side Crips, ordered the hit after a fight involving his nephew and Tupac.
Prosecutors noted that Davis has confessed to being involved in Tupac’s murder multiple times over the years. The shooting was part of a feud between the South Side Crips and the Bloods, who were connected to Death Row Records.
Davis’ defense has pointed to a 2008 agreement with federal agents that they say protects him. This agreement was related to the murder of Christopher “Biggie” Wallace, who was also killed shortly after Tupac.
However, prosecutors said the U.S. attorney couldn’t find the actual agreement but provided a standard letter that only covers one conversation and doesn’t bind other law enforcement.
During his first interview, Davis claimed he didn’t know anything about Biggie’s murder but hinted he knew who killed Tupac. Later, he confessed to his involvement and agreed to be a confidential informant for the LAPD.
Davis’ lawyer argued that Las Vegas police were aware of this from a 2009 interview, but prosecutors said he didn’t share as many details back then as he did in his book and interviews.
Davis’ attorney also mentioned a 1998 interview where Davis denied knowing who shot Tupac, suggesting police were involved under Suge Knight’s direction.
Prosecutors clarified they’re not using that 1998 interview against Davis and don’t know the terms of any agreement he had with the federal government.
They also argued that they didn’t delay in charging Davis, as the renewed investigation was triggered by his recent public statements. A judge will hear arguments on this issue in a hearing set for Tuesday.
If you have any questions, you can reach out to Katelyn Newberg at knewberg@reviewjournal.com or call 702-383-0240.
