Michael Madigan faces tough questions in his corruption trial as cross-examination reveals tense political dynamics
During the cross-examination, the prosecutor played the recording and asked Madigan if Cullerton had any ties to his family. Madigan confirmed that Cullerton is actually the godfather of his son. When pressed about the “knife” comment, Madigan chuckled and agreed he was speaking figuratively.
The prosecutor pointed out that Cullerton wasn’t even at the meeting, suggesting Madigan had figuratively stabbed him in the back. Madigan explained that he had a serious disagreement with Cullerton over campaign ads that were negative towards him.
He didn’t remember all the details of his chat with Pritzker but mentioned he might have brought up those negative ads. Madigan emphasized that it was a time for Democrats to unite, not fight among themselves.
As the questioning continued, Madigan tried to distance himself from tapes where he promised a former alderman, who turned FBI informant, a cushy board seat. He claimed he was just keeping a file of potential recommendations for Pritzker.
The prosecutor pressed him about a conversation where the informant indicated he wanted to bring clients to Madigan’s law firm. Madigan acknowledged that was the case but insisted he was just gathering names for future recommendations.
Madigan’s testimony is ongoing, and he’s expected to wrap up soon. His decision to take the stand has allowed prosecutors to present evidence that could be damaging, including a tape where he and his co-defendant joked about contractors profiting without doing much work.
Madigan has denied any wrongdoing, sharing stories about his upbringing and his political journey while trying to explain away the evidence against him. He and his co-defendant face serious charges, including bribery and running a criminal enterprise. Both men maintain their innocence.
